September 21st, 2011

Young Pup Kills Cougar in Csongrád

A fifteen-year old boy from Csongrád County has been charged with murder after the body of his 41-year old former lover was discovered in a field. Police first searched for the women who went missing, but after finding her body and digging into her past, they came across the boy, who confessed to the crime, calling it a lover’s quarrel that went too far. Whatever happened to slamming a door in someone’s face and storming off?

And here is what people were saying back before we forced readers to use Facebook to comment. Weren't those the days?
  1. borisbadenovisback says:

    Under satanic-muslim-sharia laws, his conduct was/is fully justified and he would be exonerated.

  2. Viking says:

    Nope
    But I can cheer you up that one time on a SAS-flight a few yars back, I was asked if I would change seat with a (Jewish) rabbi, then his religion forbid him to sit next to women
    Something with the could be ‘unclean’
    I refused to change seat and another passenger had to do the ‘honours’
    Of course this 15-year old guy could not have been a True Christian, then those do not sin, so he must have been Jewish, taking his religion a bit too serious

  3. Borisbadenovisback says:

    Brilliant argument: “Nope.”

    All the passengers should have refused.

  4. gitt says:

    @ Viking: It happens every day on flights from Switzerland to USA that often have a dozen rabbis or ultra-orthodox Jewish men (why? well…): they ask you to change seat “because women may prefer not to sit close to us” : is what they say to look polite. Nothing wrong. But once the man besides me accepted, so a Hasidic Jewish sat close to me. I asked to change seat, the flight assistants disagreed, I made a big fuss and finally I was moved. Nothing to do with religion from me, of course: the poor guy stinked, that was all. His black dress was greasy and he probably had not seen a shower in a week. 12 hours close to a stinking man… no way!

  5. Viking says:

    Borisbadenovisback:
    Brilliant argument: “Nope.”

    Yes on par with your slur that a 15 yo male would have the right to kill a 41 yo mistress due to sharia law
    According to sharia law adultery (zina), which includes adultery, fornication, incest/pedophilia, rape, and pimping belongs to the second category of crimes is hudud (or hadd).
    How do you get that it is OK for a man to kill a woman which is/was his mistress is out of this world
    If their relation was a case of adultery or pedophilia (the guy being too young), then it would require four witnesses to collaborate these “crimes” and circumstantial evidence are not allowed to be part of the testimonies
    So, why do you not explain your slur:
    “Under satanic-muslim-sharia laws, his conduct was/is fully justified”?
    If you cannot do that, then you are just a small-minded bigot who know nothing about anything, but what is new about you?

  6. "Awwww Yeaaaa" Jackson says:

    Is anyone surprised? Can you tell me what the background and education of the child and the unfortunate victim is? Read into it a bit. Hamburger can never be labeled filet mignon. The Hungarian Government as well as media has it’s own agenda when writing these stories. In other words, they tell you 20% of it, you have to figure out the rest…

  7. David says:

    The legal age of consent here is 14. Why do you weirdo’s
    think that sex with a 15 year old is pedephilia? He is not a
    child.

  8. borisbadenovisback says:

    Islamic Infamy and its institutionalized misogyny is so well documented over the last 14 centuries, only a politically correct, open-minded moron would require the explanation of any castigation of a so-called religion created by a mass murdering pedophile. And I love the way some bozos think that the “four witnesses” requirement (for the woman, NOT the man) is perfectly compatible with Western legal standards. Sure and female genital mutilation and honor killings must also be respected.

    I encourage all politically correct morons to read about islam. Here’s a snippet for you:

    In 623 A.D. Mohammed was so infuriated with the female poet Asma Bint Marwan for criticizing him, that he sent his henchman to kill her and her five children. They ripped the infant from her breast and hacked it to pieces before her very eyes. They then made her watch the murder of her other four children, before raping and stabbing her repeatedly to death. After the butchery Mohammed told his henchman, “You have done a service to Allah and his Messenger.”

    I have named my dog mohammed and I use pages from the koran to line my bird cage.

  9. borisbadenovisback says:

    The more I think about it, I should rename my dog. What did this loyal creature ever do to be named after an incestuous necrophiliac and homosexual torturer and mutilator?

    Peace be upon my poor pup……

  10. Viking says:

    borisbadenovisback:
    Comment #8
    Sep 27, ’11 @ 23:58
    female genital mutilation and honor killings must also be respected
    —-
    Check out the simplest wiki on the first subject:
    “The term “pharaonic circumcision” (Type III) stems from its practice in Ancient Egypt under the Pharaohs, and “fibula” (in “infibulation”) refers to the Roman practice of piercing the outer labia with a fibula, or brooch
    Leonard Kuber and Judith Muascher write that circumcised females have been found among Egyptian mummies, and that Herodotus (c. 484 BCE – c. 425 BCE) referred to the practice when he visited Egypt. There is reference on a Greek papyrus from 163 BCE to the procedure being conducted on girls in Memphis, the ancient Egyptian capital, and Strabo (c. 64 BCE – c. 23 CE), the Greek geographer, reported it when he visited Egypt in 25 BCE”
    .
    So already the Ancient Egyptians did it, so where is the connection to Islam (or even Judaism) here?

    Honour killings and Islam?
    Wiki again:
    “Matthew Goldstein has noted that honor killings were encouraged in ancient Rome, where male family members who did not take actions against the female adulterers in their family were “actively persecuted”

    Lavinia – a historical figure of Rome found in Shakespeare’s Titus Andronicus – is killed by her father after having been raped and mutilated. In ancient Rome, being raped was seen as dishonorable to the point of destroying a woman’s life and reputation, and honor killing was supposed to be a “merciful” act.”
    .
    So we have in our, so great European history, honour killings as a socially accepted method, much before Islam was ever invented
    So who is the “Political Correct” person?

  11. borisbadenovisback says:

    The connection, my dear ignominious defender of savages, is as obvious as your politically correct ignorance. The religion of barbarism loves its clitorectomies.

    Sunnah 1:8 Um Atiyyat al-Ansariyyah said:

    “A woman used to perform circumcision in Medina. The Prophet … said to her: ‘Do not cut too severely as that is better for a woman and more desirable for a husband’.”

    And it’s still being practised by the savages:

    http://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com/2009/03/20/female-genital-mutilation-predominant-among-muslim-households/

    A Muslim’s sense of self-worth (izzat) primarily depends on bullying and brutalising women. His culture gives him no other sources of self-esteem because Islamic accomplishments are non-existent. This bullying and brutalising takes the form of gang rape against “kuffar” women; institutionalised beatings; and genital mutilation and acid attacks on disobedient muslim women. Female relatives who bring dishonor must be killed.

    Those of us who are civilized know that our civilization has developed exponentially since the PAGANS in Rome and Egypt were predominant.
    Our civilization, thankfully, was not built on so-called honor killings and clitorectomies. Our civilization was built on Greek philosophy, Roman polity, and Catholic dogma.

    Once again, you have failed. This seminar is concluded.

  12. Viking says:

    Those of us who are civilized know that our civilization has developed exponentially since the PAGANS in Rome and Egypt were predominant.
    Our civilization, thankfully, was not built on so-called honor killings and clitorectomies. Our civilization was built on Greek philosophy, Roman polity, and Catholic dogma

    So “WE” have “developed exponentially”, but not Muslims, that is your slur
    With that slur you then quote an old text that actually wants the woman to cut less. Just read the text, it is obvious:
    ‘Um Atiyyat al-Ansariyyah said: A woman used to perform circumcision in Medina. The Prophet (pbuh) said to her: Do not cut too severely as that is better for a woman and more desirable for a husband’.”
    The woman was going to proceed with the circumcision anyway; Muhammad suggested that she remove a smaller amount of her genitalia than she had perhaps intended to. Look at the ending:
    “as that is better for a woman and more desirable for a husband”
    I am a man, why should I bother if the woman I screw with enjoys it or not?
    This text actually tells me, I should take care that my woman enjoys it also
    .
    No doubt about it, Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) is practised in some countries/areas, but is it religious?
    The minority Ethiopian Jewish community (Beta Israel) practice FGM in a non-religious ceremony. It may be performed only by a Jewish woman. Many Ethiopian Jews who emigrate to Israel abandon the practice of FGM
    So, here we have it. A religious identity that changes behaviour after culture changes, like moving to another country, but a few still use it, even being Jews in Israel
    Here we need to enforce our current cultural values, but we do not do that with slur, speaking about “savages”, we do that with cultural “indoctrination” and laws

 
More content from Hungary's leading foreign-language media network
About Pestiside.hu | Become an All Hungary Member | Newsletters | Contact Us | Advertise With Us
All content © 2004-2012 The All Hungary Media Group. Articles, comments and other information on the All Hungary Media Group's network of sites are provided "as is" without guarantees, warranties, or representations of any kind, and the opinions and views expressed in such articles and columns are not necessarily those of the All Hungary Media Group.